|
Post by awesomeace on Dec 21, 2011 23:43:16 GMT -5
I know many of you are new to a dynasty league so should we establish a trade panel to ensure that no "unfair" trades go through and maintain the parity of the league or have no panel since you all believe that the decision of a FF manager should be respected?
Up to you guys... this could also affect the rate of how fast a trade goes through.
|
|
morkim
Junior Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by morkim on Dec 27, 2011 16:35:48 GMT -5
I don't like trade panels, only because I think opinions differ. Like I know at some point I was trading Cam Newton this season for a Lynch+Marshall package. Some people were really ticked about it. But I needed a WR/RB. So I personally vote no, but can understand if it does happen.
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Dec 28, 2011 8:19:11 GMT -5
We have a veto board at the graveyard league, and I'm not fond of it, but it's really more intended for draft pick trades (which we haven't ( ) addressed here), and we use a draft pick trade analyzer as a baseline tool. I honestly don't foresee any collusion in a group where we know each other, nor any totally stupid trades. In the case of Newton for Lynch, you could look at the rest of the 2 lineups to assess whether or not both teams at least somewhat benefit. For example, if the guy trading Cam (to a guy that had Schaub) has Romo, and his Best then F-Jax went down (that happened to me), Lynch becomes very attractive, as does Cam. Most trades will be at least slightly lopsided. I have no problem with you deciding, as long as you're reasonably liberal. What's wrong with 2 day league votes?
|
|
|
Post by chartreuse on Dec 28, 2011 11:04:39 GMT -5
I'm going to abstain here because I could go either way. I'm sure at some point I'll go off on someone for making a trade that affects my team, but at the same time, reasons for trades can be really weird. Sometimes I'm willing to trade a better than average player for a not so hot player simply because I want him on my team as a mascot, or to match up with another team I have. I'm weird that way!
|
|
|
Post by awesomeace on Dec 28, 2011 23:37:58 GMT -5
I wasn't too fond of the idea in the 1st place... I hate trade panels and such because player values espicially in dynasty can vary a ton. Just making sure though since some of us are new and Dive, yes we are trading picks, picks in the startup or picks in future rookie drafts will be made available to trade
|
|
morkim
Junior Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by morkim on Dec 29, 2011 14:45:02 GMT -5
We have a veto board at the graveyard league, and I'm not fond of it, but it's really more intended for draft pick trades (which we haven't ( ) addressed here), and we use a draft pick trade analyzer as a baseline tool. I honestly don't foresee any collusion in a group where we know each other, nor any totally stupid trades. In the case of Newton for Lynch, you could look at the rest of the 2 lineups to assess whether or not both teams at least somewhat benefit. For example, if the guy trading Cam (to a guy that had Schaub) has Romo, and his Best then F-Jax went down (that happened to me), Lynch becomes very attractive, as does Cam. Most trades will be at least slightly lopsided. I have no problem with you deciding, as long as you're reasonably liberal. What's wrong with 2 day league votes? Exactly as you said. I had Brady/Cam and I only had Welker at WR and bleh RBs. But the trade got veto'd. So I don't really care for panels.
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Dec 29, 2011 19:33:35 GMT -5
Guess we got plenty of time for this, but so far so good. ;-P
|
|
|
Post by awesomeace on Jan 5, 2012 3:11:18 GMT -5
Be much appreciated if everyone can vote on this...
|
|
|
Post by stichyleafer on Jan 5, 2012 16:12:28 GMT -5
I would say no. We have these pro boards to vent and possibly discuss why we made a trade or just to tell someone to mind their own bees wax. If something gets out of hand then we will just mutiny Ace and make him walk the plank.
|
|