|
Post by Steelers 1954 on Sept 21, 2020 15:22:40 GMT -5
I know that I said the score settings would not be changed but after thinking more here's some of my suggestions
1)Change 1 of the Flex Positions to WR/TE this way we would only be starting 3 RB's and there maybe no need to limit the amount of backs but something to keep track of and adjust if needed.
2)Change the score settings from .5 points per carry to .2 points per carry. This still gives some added value but not as much as it was, hopefully the wealth of the RB's will be spread around more equally.
Would like input from everyone.
|
|
|
Post by craig440 on Sept 21, 2020 16:31:40 GMT -5
To be honest. I was fine with everything the way it is. I had no problem. I'm kicking ass and don't even know how many RB's I have. I also have no problem with making changes next year. This is why I don't give a lot of input as to what changes to make. I am fine with how it is. But I don't think I like the flex not including the RB option. Maybe the cut from .5 per carry to .2 is okay with me. [/img] [/img] I'm already polishing my trophy.
|
|
|
Post by craig440 on Sept 21, 2020 17:26:39 GMT -5
After this week I will be the high scorer. I only played two RB's. I only have four and two of them are the Charger back ups that are on my bench. I am doing that on purpose and think Kelly will become the guy. He did great. I lost Marlin Mack so I need one more. Having nine RB's is not an advantage if you ask me. My receivers I was able to get kicked ass. But I do maybe need another RB if someone wants a trade.
|
|
|
Post by craig440 on Sept 21, 2020 17:47:54 GMT -5
If you check ADB's game. One receiver on his bench scored as many points as four of his RB's combined.
|
|
Pack as guest on phone
Guest
|
Post by Pack as guest on phone on Sept 21, 2020 17:58:05 GMT -5
I'm with craig where I was fine how it is but can live with changes. A rb limit of 8 is fairly standard in most leagues I am in so i will suggest that and keep things the way they are. that way the league largely stays as it was for so long. I usually go rb heavy but i ain't winning titles every year either. The scoring leads to huge games from any position deciding matchups. If people vote to change one flex to wr/te i would be fine with it but prefer it as a regular flex
|
|
|
Post by craig440 on Sept 21, 2020 18:02:16 GMT -5
Plus with all the injuries so far, there will be new players that are available.
|
|
|
Post by Steelers 1954 on Sept 22, 2020 8:31:46 GMT -5
I'm with craig where I was fine how it is but can live with changes. A rb limit of 8 is fairly standard in most leagues I am in so i will suggest that and keep things the way they are. that way the league largely stays as it was for so long. I usually go rb heavy but i ain't winning titles every year either. The scoring leads to huge games from any position deciding matchups. If people vote to change one flex to wr/te i would be fine with it but prefer it as a regular flex Yes you do go RB heavy but you also don't weaken other positions by doing so, I must say you use the score settings quite well.
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Sept 22, 2020 14:18:53 GMT -5
To be honest. I was fine with everything the way it is. I had no problem. I'm kicking ass and don't even know how many RB's I have. I also have no problem with making changes next year. This is why I don't give a lot of input as to what changes to make. I am fine with how it is. But I don't think I like the flex not including the RB option. Maybe the cut from .5 per carry to .2 is okay with me. [/img] I'm already polishing my trophy. [/quote] Been meaning to work on these smileys. Finally able to crack into my Allenhost account. Means I have to take each of these freaking smileys that don't work, upload them to Allenhost (my private pic hosting site), and then download them again to here. Huge headache, but I digress. I'm not a big fan of either a WR/TE spot or cutting the carries from .5 to .2. We've been doing it at NFFL league for years. Never an issue was it? And 2 full flex spots in a 10 team league should not be a problem. Hell, even if it were a 14 team league, everyone should have the same issues, right? People, even Mike has no problem with the .5. Packdog says a limit of 8 if at all, is standard. I could live with 7. Or maybe cut the PPC to .3. I won all 4 leagues this week. Where is the one kissing the Lombardi, that was the best one. Damn.
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Nov 30, 2020 13:56:24 GMT -5
I think we should bump the kicker, like 15 - 20%-ish to make it worthwhile to start one, if ya know what I mean *cough* dirtybird *cough*. We have huge upgrades at RB, PPR, and 6 pt pass TD, yet the most minimal upgrades at K. Both my leagues (and neither is .5 per rush attempt) have my kickers way ahead of NFFL and Hive. (i.e. Fins Sanders 12 pts in NFFL and Hive. 14 in Yahoo BC, and 15 in NFL BC. So they are well-valued especially in light of the fact that other positions are not that inflated. Or maybe that is the whole point of inflating other positions. If that was not the point, then why inflate any of them? Anyway, the kicker should be worth more, lends a level of complexity too.
|
|